Preview

Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases

Advanced search

CLUSTER ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF ASTHMATIC PATHOLOGIC MANIFESTATIONS DURING STAY AT THE RESORT

https://doi.org/10.21292/2075-1230-2018-96-2-16-21

Abstract

The objective of the study: to classify the pathologic manifestations of asthma using cluster analysis and based on the obtained clusters to substantiate the identification of asthma phenotypes while being at the resort. Subjects and methods. 300 asthma patients who arrived to Yalta for treatment at the resort were examined. Of those with persisting asthma, 55 (18.33%) patients had a mild severity of the disease, 205 (68.33%) had moderate severity and 27 (9%) had the advanced severity of the disease. 13 (4.33%) were found to have intermittent asthma. 42 (14%) patients had the controlled course of asthma, 60 (20%) had it partially controlled, and 198 (66%) patients suffered from the uncontrolled asthma. The cluster analysis was used to classify the manifestations of asthma at the resort. Results. 105 rates were analyzed in 300 asthma patients, who had treatment at the resort. The structure consisting of 7 clusters was formed through cluster analysis. 23 rates had high values of inter-cluster dispersion describing the clinical and functional state of asthma patients, which could be considered as separate clusters. Each cluster had certain disorders of clinical and functional state of asthma patients, typical of this cluster only, thus the generated structure of clusters could be considered to be a classification of asthmatic pathologic manifestations, i.e. asthmatic phenotypes during the stay at the resort. Conclusions. 7 asthmatic phenotypes typical of staying at the resort were identified, characterized by different pathogenetic manifestations, which could be useful when planning sanatorium-resort care for such patients.

 

About the Authors

L. Sh. Dudchenko
Sechenov Academic Research Institute of Physical Treatment Methods, Medical Climatology and Rehabilitation,Yalta
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of Pulmonology Research Department


V. M. Sаvchenko
S. I. Georgievsky Medical Academy, V. I. Vernadsky Crimea Federal University, Simferopol
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor


References

1. Bogolyubov V.M. (eds.) Meditsinskaya reabilitatsiya. [Medical Rehabilitation]. Vol. 1, 3rd ed., suppl. and amend., Moscow, Binom Publ., 2010.

2. Zagidulin Sh.Z., Galimova E.S., Sukhovskaya O.А., Ezhova G.Yu. Life quality assessment in the patients suffering from asthma exacerbation. Pulmonoloiya,

3. , no. 1, pp. 49-53. (In Russ.)

4. Malyavin А.G., Epifanov V.А., Glaznova I.I. Reabilitatsiya pri zabolevaniyakh organov dykhaniya. [Rehabilitation of those with respiratory diseases]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2010.

5. Savchenko V.M. Automation of prediction of exacerbation and treatment outcomes of asthma. In: Donich S.G., Soldatchenko S.S., Savchenko V.M. Prognozirovanie obostreniy bronkhialnoy astmy. [Predicting asthma exacerbation]. Dnepropetrovsk, IMA Press Publ., 2010, pp. 86-120.

6. Trukhacheva N.V. Matematicheskaya statistika v mediko-biologicheskikh issledovaniyakh s primeneniem paketa Statistica. [Mathematical statistics in medical and biological studies using Statistica software]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2012.

7. Bel E.N. Clinical phenotypes of asthma. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med., 2004, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 44-50.

8. Chung K.F., Bel E.H., Wenzel S.E. Difficult-to-Treat Severe Asthma. European Respiratory Society Monograph. 2011, vol. 51.

9. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention [updated 2014, 2015]. Available at: http:.www.ginasthma.org. Accessed November 12, 2016.

10. Green R. H., Brightling C. E., McKenna S., Hargadon B., Parker D., Bradding P., Wardlaw A. J., Pavord I. D. Asthma exacerbation and sputum eosinophil counts: a randomized controlled trial // Lancet. ‒ 2002. ‒ № 360. ‒ Р. 1715-1721.

11. Roth M., Zhong J., Zumkeller C., S'ng C. T., Goulet S., Tamm M. The role of IgE-receptors in IgE-dependent airway smooth muscle cell remodeling // PLoS One. ‒ 2013. ‒ Vol. 8, № 2. ‒ Р. e56015.

12. Simpson J. L., Scott R., Boyle M. J., Gibson P.G. Inflammatory subtypes in asthma: assessment and identification using induced sputum // Respirology. ‒ 2006. ‒ Vol. 11. ‒ Р. 54-61.

13. The ENFUMOSA cross-sectional European multicenter study of the clinical phenotype of chronic severe asthma. European Network for Understanding Mechanisms of Severe Asthma // Eur. Respir. J. ‒ 2003. ‒ Vol. 22, № 3. ‒ Р. 470-477.

14. Ware J. E. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Second printing. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1997.

15. Wenzel S. Severe asthma: from characteristics to phenotypes to endotypes // Clin. Exp. Allergy. ‒ 2012. ‒ Vol. 42, № 5. ‒ Р. 650-658.


Review

For citations:


Dudchenko L.Sh., Sаvchenko V.M. CLUSTER ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF ASTHMATIC PATHOLOGIC MANIFESTATIONS DURING STAY AT THE RESORT. Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases. 2018;96(2):16-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2075-1230-2018-96-2-16-21

Views: 2482


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2075-1230 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1506 (Online)