The problem of refusal from immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: results of a multi-center sociological study

The objective: to study the reasons for the refusal of legally authorized representatives of children to conduct mass immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis using a representative sample of population and to outline possible ways to change this negative situation.

Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional multi-center study was conducted. In 8 regions of the Russian Federation, the survey was conducted in 1,059 legally authorized representatives of children refusing to undergo mass immunodiagnostics of tuberculosis. The following main reasons for refusal were found out: fear of side effects and complications (32.6%), distrust in the quality of the test (29.7%), lack of understanding of the need to examine a child for tuberculosis. 72.2% of respondents demonstrated poor awareness of the problem of tuberculosis – they denied this problem or associated it with a different social environment, which was fertile ground for negative information received through various channels. To solve this problem, it is necessary to intensify health education in various groups of the population, including work with religious communities. Additional resources can be used such as targeted social advertisements, which will allow covering with health education propaganda of 33.1% of people who do not want to receive information about tuberculosis, expanding the regulation for the use of alternative methods of screening for tuberculosis.

The authors state that they have no conflict of interests.

1. Аksenova V.А., Sterlikov S.А., Belilovsky E.M., Kazykina T.N., Rusakova L.I. Tuberculosis epidemiology in children. Sovremennye Problemy Zdravookhraneniya i Meditsinskoy Statistiki, 2019, no.1 (Epub.), (In Russ.) Available: http://www.healthproblem.ru/files/pdf/218-pdf.pdf (Accessed: 15.08.19).

2. Zelikman M.I. Digital X-ray diagnostic systems. Radiologiya-Praktika, 2008, no. 4, pp. 38-49. (In Russ.)

3. Ignatieva V.I., Аvksentieva M.V., Omelyanovskiy V.V., Khachatryan G.R. Clinical and economic modeling of the results of using T-SPOT.TB in immunocompromised children. Farmakoekonomika, 2014, no. 3, pp. 12-19. (In Russ.)

4. Kazykina T.N. The system of immunodiagnosis and preventive treatment of tuberculosis from the point of view of applied system analysis. Materialy VII Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem Аktualnye voprosy profilaktiki, diagnostiki i lecheniya tuberkuleza u detey i podrostkov. [Abst. Book of the VIIth All-Russian Scientific Practical Conference with International Participation on Topical Issues of Prevention, Diagnostics and Treatment of Tuberculosis in Children and Adolescents]. (Epub.), (In Russ.) Available: http://www.humanhealth.ru/images/conference/28_03_2018_Kalinigrad/Tezisy/16.pdf (Accessed: 08.08.19).

5. Koretskaya N.M., Zagorulko O.V., Logunova N.А., Narkevich А.N. Mantoux test an Diaskintest in tuberculosis detection in children of pre-school and school age. Voprosy Prakticheskoy Pediatrii, 2016, no. 3, pp. 30-35. (In Russ.)

6. Kriger E.А., Samodova O.V., Rogushina N.L., Borisova T.А. The attitude of parents towards vaccination of children and factors related to vaccine hesitancy. Pediatriya. Journal im. G.N. Speranskogo, 2016, no. 2 (95), pp. 91-95. (In Russ.)

7. Nechaeva O.B. Epidemicheskaya situatsiya po tuberkulezu detskogo naseleniya Rossii. [TB situation in child population of Russia]. (Epub.), Available: https://mednet.ru/images/materials/CMT/2018_god_tuberkulez_deti.pdf (Accessed: 08.08.19).

8. Nechaeva O.B., Biragova O.K. TB situation in the Russian Federation. Sotsialnye Aspekty Zdorovya Naseleniya, 2013, no. 5 (33), Electronic Scientific Journal, (In Russ.). Available: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/514/30/lang,ru/ (Accessed: 10.08.19).

9. Portnoy L.M., Sherman L.А. X-ray diagnostics in Moscow Region (current state and future perspectives). Аlmanakh Klinicheskoy Meditsiny, 2003, no. 6, pp. 347-377. (In Russ.)

10. Dewan P.K., Grinsdale J., Liska S., Wong E., Fallstad R., Kawamura L.M. Feasibility, acceptability, and cost of tuberculosis testing by whole-blood interferon-gamma assay. BMC Infect Dis., 2006, no. 6, (Epub.), Available: https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2334-6-47 (Accessed: 08.08.19). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-47.

11. Levesque J.F., Dongier P., Drassard P., Allard R. Acceptance of screening and completion of treatment for latent tuberculosis infection among refugee claimants in Canada. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis., 2004, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 711-717.

12. Minodier P., Lamarre V., Carle M-E., Blais D., Ovetchkine P., Tapiero B. Evaluation of school-based program for diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in immigrant children. J. Infect. Public Health, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2010.02.001.

13. Mulder C., Mulleners B., Borgdorff M.W., Leth F. Predictive value of the tuberculin skin test among newly arriving immigrants. PLOS One, Available: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0060130 (Accessed 02.05.19). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060130.

14. Pooran A., Booth H., Miller R.F., Scott G., Bardi M., Huggett J.F., Rook G., Zumla A., Dheda K. Different screening strategies (single or dual) for the diagnosis of suspected latent tuberculosis: a cost effectiveness analysis. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 2010, vol. 10, (Epub.), Available: https://bmcpulmmed.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2466-10-7 (Accessed: 16.05.18).

15. Takamura N., Kryshenko N., Masyakin V., Tamashiro H., Yamashita S. Chernobyl-induced radiophobia and the incidence of tuberculosis. The Lancet, 2000, vol. 356, pp. 257,

16. Tuberculosis Control Program. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. (Epub.), Available: http://www.dhs.pa.gov/cs/groups/webcontent/

17. documents/bulletin_admin/d_003700.pdf (Accessed 02.05.19).