Experience of Surgical Treatment of Tuberculous and Nonspecific Spondylitis with a Barrier Collagen Membrane to Stimulate Osteogenesis in the Site of Bone Block Formation
https://doi.org/10.58838/2075-1230-2024-102-5-58-63
Abstract
The objective: to increase effectiveness of surgical treatment of infectious spondylitis with impaired support function of the spinal column through the combined use of a titanium cylindrical block mesh, a resorbable double-sided collagen membrane and an osteoconductor to achieve successful spinal fusion.
Subjects and Methods. A prospective monocenter cohort study included 17 patients with infectious spondylitis who were operated with anterior spinal fusion with a titanium mesh graft filled with an osteoconductor and delimited by a barrier double-sided collagen membrane. In the postoperative period, antibacterial treatment was administered based according to the results of bacteriological tests of biological specimensl. Formation of the bone block (spondylodesis) was evaluated by the scale for assessing the fusion of the graft with the bed of the cranial and caudal vertebrae.
Results. 6 months after surgery, the fusion of the graft with the bed of the supporting vertebra according to the Baulin scale was 4.5 ± 0.4 scores on the average. In 5 (29%) patients, a clear, homogeneous bone block with a transition of bone beams was achieved after surgery which amounted to 5 scores by the Baulin scale.
About the Authors
E. O. PeretsmanasRussian Federation
Evgeniy O. Peretsmanas, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of Research Department of Osteoarticular Pathology, Honored Doctor of Russia
Build. 2, 4 Dostoevskiy St., Moscow, 127994 Phone: + 7 (495) 681-11-66
A. A. Bezzubov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr A. Bezzubov, Neurosurgeon of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Department
Build. 2, 4 Dostoevskiy St., Moscow, 127994 Phone: + 7 (495) 681-11-66
N. N. Nikolaev
Russian Federation
Nikolay N. Nikolaev, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgeon of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Department
Build. 2, 4 Dostoevskiy St., Moscow, 127994 Phone: + 7 (495) 681-11-66
V. A. Chumakov
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Chumakov, Head of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Department, Orthopedist, Neurosurgeon
Build. 2, 4 Dostoevskiy St., Moscow, 127994 Phone: + 7 (495) 681-11-66
I. V. Golubenkov
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Golubenkov, Head of Deparment, Anesthesiologist, Emergency Physician of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Deparment with Intensive Care Wards
Build. 2, 4 Dostoevskiy St., Moscow, 127994 Phone: + 7 (495) 681-11-66
References
1. Baulin I.A., Gavrilov P.V., Sovetova N.A., Mushkin A.Yu. Radiological analysis of the bone block formation in using different materials for anterior fusion in patients with infectious spondylitis. Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika, 2015, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2015.1.83-89
2. Lekishvili M.V., Balberkin A.V., Kolondaev A.F., Vasiliev M.G., Baranetskiy A.L., Buklemishev Yu.V. The first experience of using the biocomposite material “Osteomatrix” in a bone pathology clinic. Vestnik Travmotologii i Ortopedii Im. N.N. Priorova, 2002, no. 4, pp. 80-83. (In Russ.)
3. Rozhin V.V., Kirilenko S.I., Nadyrov E.A., Nikolaev V.I. Osteoplastic materials for spinal fusion. Problemy Zdorovya I Ekologii, 2019, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 1-7. (In Russ.)
4. Soldatos N., Stylianou P., Koydou V., Angelov N., Yukna R., Romanos G. Limitations and options for using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration. Kvintessentsiya Int., 2017, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 131-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.3290/ j.qi.a37133
5. Irmola T.M., Häkkinen A., Järvenpää S., Marttinen I., Vihtonen K., Neva M. Reoperation rates following instrumented lumbar spine fusion. Spine, 2018, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002291
6. Blumenthal S.L., Ohnmeiss D.D., NASS. Intervertebral cages for degenerative spinal diseases. Spine J., 2003, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 301-309.
7. Bridwell K.H., Sedgewick T.A., O'Brien M.F., Lenke L.G. Baldus C. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J. Spinal Disord., 1993, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 461-472.
8. Oryan A., Alidadi S., Moshiri A., Maffulli N. Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J. Orthop. Surg. Res., 2014, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-18
9. Thaler M., Lechner R., Gstöttner M., Kobel C., Bach C. The use of beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur. Spine J., 2013, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2541-3
Review
For citations:
Peretsmanas E.O., Bezzubov A.A., Nikolaev N.N., Chumakov V.A., Golubenkov I.V. Experience of Surgical Treatment of Tuberculous and Nonspecific Spondylitis with a Barrier Collagen Membrane to Stimulate Osteogenesis in the Site of Bone Block Formation. Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases. 2024;102(5):58-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.58838/2075-1230-2024-102-5-58-63